ANSWERS TO THE MOST
FREQUENTLY
ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT
REGULATION 64
Copyright 1998, New
York State Auto Collision Technician's Association
Edward C. Kizenberger,
Executive Director
Richard W. Skora,
President
Eugene R. Anderson,
Esq. Gary M. Fader, Esq.
Anderson, Kill &
Olick, P.C. Lawyer
and Insurance Consultant
Attorneys and
Counselors at Law 19
Rhoda Avenue
1251 Avenue of the
Americas Nutley, N.J. 07110
New York, N.Y. 10020-1182 (201) 667-7373
(212) 278-1751
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
Introduction...................................................................... 1
Answers to the Most
Frequently Asked Questions About Regulation 64
Part 1: Partial Losses
I. Choosing
the Repair Shop................................ 3
II. Inspecting
the Damages.................................... 9
III. The
Designated Representative...................... 12
IV. The
Insurance Company's Estimate............... 15
V. Non-original
Equipment Parts........................ 19
VI. Discovering
Hidden Damage.......................... 22
VII. Allowable
Deductions..................................... 23
VIII. Getting
Paid...................................................... 25
Part 2: Total Losses
I. Cash
Settlement Methods............................... 29
II. Vehicle
Replacement....................................... 33
III. Allowable
Depreciation................................... 34
IV. Right of Recourse............................................ 36
V. Salvage
Value.................................................. 38
VI. The
30-Day Settlement Rule and its Exceptions 40
VII. Loss
of Use....................................................... 42
VIII. .......................................................... Subrogation 42
IX. Losses
Due to Theft......................................... 45
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd)
PAGE
Part 3: Third Party Damage Claims
I. Initial
Claims Processing................................ 49
II. Comparative
Negligence................................. 50
III. Requesting
Additional Information............... 51
IV. Informing
the Policyholder............................. 52
V. Acceptance
or Denial of a Claim.................... 53
VI. Permissible
Delays.......................................... 54
Part 4:
Record keeping Requirements
I. Record
keeping Requirements........................ 55
Part 5: Text of Regulation 64
§216.0 Preamble........................................................... 56
§216.1 Definitions........................................................ 59
§216.2 Applicability.................................................... 60
§216.3 Misrepresentation
of policy provisions......... 61
§216.4 Failure
to acknowledge pertinent communications 62
§216.5 Standards
for prompt investigation of claims 63
§216.6 Standards
for prompt, fair and equitable settlements 64
§216.7 Standards for prompt, fair and equitable
settlement
of motor vehicle
physical damage claims...... 67
§216.8 Verification and reporting requirements
applicable
to losses arising under
automobile physical
damage policies and
reporting of third‑party
property damage losses................................... 90
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Contd.)
PAGE
§216.9 Written notice to claimants of payment of
claim in third‑party
settlements...................... 97
§216.10 Standards for prompt, fair and equitable
settlement
of third‑party
property damage claims arising
under Motor vehicle
liability insurance contracts 98
§216.11 Examinations................................................. 101
§216.12 Forms.............................................................. 103
Index.............................................................................. 110
INTRODUCTION
When an automobile in
New York State is damaged, the first thought is: "fix it" and the
second thought is: "insurance".
The "fix it" part is familiar to the members of the New York
State Auto Collision Technician's Association (NYSACT). The "insurance" part is not.
Insurance in New York
is regulated by state law. A number of
statutes and regulations apply to automobile body repair insurance claims,
including what is referred to as "Regulation 64."
Why is understanding
Regulation 64 and the other state laws important? Insurance companies know that every dollar paid out in claims,
every dollar spent on auto body repairs, is a direct hit to the insurance
company's bottom line. Insurance
companies also know that the automobile owners, the policyholders, are unaware
of their rights when faced with an auto body repair claim. Without the protection of, and an
understanding of, the state laws governing insurance, the policyholders and the
members of the NYSACT are at a disadvantage.
This pamphlet is a source of information for
NYSACT members about the "insurance" part of automobile body repair
claims. It answers frequently asked
questions about procedures to be followed and provides, with each question, the
text of the law that relates to that question.
All of the questions are numbered.
A complete copy of Regulation 64 is also provided.
Answers to questions can be found either by
referring to the Table of Contents or the Index. The Index is arranged by subject, with the number of the question
and the page number listed after the subject.
In order to make the
questions and answers easy to read the insurance company (often termed the
"insurer" in the statutes and regulations) is referred to as the
"insurance company" and the person who has purchased the insurance
policy, or who is covered by the insurance policy (often called the
"insured" in the statutes and the regulations), is referred to as the
"policyholder."
This pamphlet is intended to be a resource
for use every day in every NYSACT member's shop. If you have suggestions or comments, please contact me.
Edward C. Kizenberger,
Executive Director
(516) 474-0596
ANSWERS TO THE MOST FREQUENTLY
ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT
REGULATION 64
PART 1: PARTIAL
LOSSES
I. CHOOSING THE REPAIR SHOP
1. Q: Can an insurance
company compel a policyholder to use a particular repair facility?
A: No.
Any insurance company attempting to do so would find itself in direct
violation of Section 2610 of the New York Insurance Code [N.Y. Ins. L. §2610
(McKinney 1997)]. It would then not
only be subject to severe penalties from the Insurance Department, but it would
expose itself to a civil suit by the policyholder for unfair and fraudulent
trade practices.
N.Y. Ins. L. §2610
(a) Whenever a motor vehicle collision or
comprehensive loss shall have been suffered by an insured, no insurer providing
collision or comprehensive coverage therefor shall require that repairs be made
to such vehicle in a particular place or shop or by a particular concern.
(b) In processing any such claim (other than a
claim solely involving window glass), the insurer shall not, unless expressly
requested by the insured, recommend or suggest repairs be made to such vehicle
in a particular place or shop or by a particular concern.
This is further
supported by a requirement in the Motor Vehicle Repair Shop Registration Act
[N.Y. Veh. & Traf. L. §398-d.4.(a)].
N.Y. Veh. & Traf.
L. §398-d
4. (a) Every motor vehicle repair shop shall
display in a conspicuous place in such shop a sign stating: PURSUANT TO SECTION
2610 OF THE INSURANCE LAW AN INSURANCE COMPANY MAY NOT REQUIRE THAT REPAIRS BE
MADE TO A MOTOR VEHICLE IN A PARTICULAR PLACE OR REPAIR SHOP. YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO HAVE YOUR AUTOMOBILE
REPAIRED IN THE SHOP OF YOUR CHOICE.
In addition, every
insurance company drive-in (including mobile units) must post this sign because
they must also be registered as repair shops.
2. Q: Can
an insurance company suggest one or more repair shops?
A: This Regulation has recently changed. Contact LIABRA for clarification.
This is further
supported by a requirement in the Motor Vehicle Repair Shop Registration Act
[N.Y. Veh. & Traf. L. §398-d.4.(a)].
N.Y. Veh. & Traf.
L. §398-d
4. (a) Every
motor vehicle repair shop shall display in a conspicuous place in such shop a
sign stating: PURSUANT TO SECTION 2610 OF THE INSURANCE LAW AN INSURANCE
COMPANY MAY NOT REQUIRE THAT REPAIRS BE MADE TO A MOTOR VEHICLE IN A PARTICULAR
PLACE OR REPAIR SHOP. YOU HAVE A RIGHT
TO HAVE YOUR AUTOMOBILE REPAIRED IN THE SHOP OF YOUR CHOICE.
In addition, every
insurance company drive-in (including mobile units) must post this sign because
they must also be registered as repair shops.
3. Q: How will I know that
the policyholder made such a request?
A: The insurer must retain
such a request in its claim file. [Reg.64 Sec. 216.7 (15) (iii)
Sec. 216.7 (15) (iii) shall retain in its
claim file a signed section 2610 of the Insurance Law Disclosure Statement (NYS
APD I‑a), contained in section 216.12 of this Part, or other written
documentation that the insured requested recommendation of a repair
facility. If the insured has verbally
requested a recommendation of a repair facility prior to the issuance of the
prescribed Notice of Rights form, the requirement for written proof of referral
shall be satisfied by a notation in the claim files as to the date of such
request and the identity of the person to whom such request was made. The requirement of this subparagraph shall
not be applicable to a claim solely involving window glass.
4. Q: What
about verbal requests for recommendations?
A: Verbal requests are acceptable, but the
insurance company must note the request in its file along with the date it was
made and to whom it was made. [Reg. 64,
Sec. 216.7(b)(15)(iii) see above]
5. Q: What if the insurer and insured/DR cannot reach an
agreed price?
A: Only than can the
insurer recommend a back-up shop after the insured is furnished with a
prescribed Notice of rights letter (NYS APD 1), contained in section 216.12 of
this part.
Sec. 216.7 (14)
(i)(ii) And Sec. 216.7 (15)
(i)(ii)(iii)
Sec. 216.7(14) (i)
If after negotiations an agreed price cannot be reached, the insurer
must furnish the insured with a prescribed Notice of Rights letter (NYS APD 1),
contained in section 216.12 of this Part.
The requirement of this subparagraph shall not be applicable to a claim
solely involving window glass.
INSURER LETTERHEAD
NOTICE OF RIGHTS UNDER YOUR
PHYSICAL DAMAGE INSURANCE POLICY
INSURED______________________
CLAIM #______________________
POLICY
#_____________________
DATE OF
ACCIDENT_____________
Dear Insured:
We have been unable,
after negotiating in good faith, to reach an agreed price with you, your
Designated Representative and/or your repairer _______________________, the
repairer of your choice.
Pursuant to Regulation
64 of the New York Insurance Department, we are supplying you with the
following information and optional waiver.
Our offer of $________
plus your deductible of $_________ and $__________ of betterment or previous
damage deduction is sufficient to repair your vehicle to its pre‑accident
condition at a repair shop located reasonably convenient to you. We are able to provide you with the identity
of the repair shop that will repair your vehicle at our estimate, but under the
Insurance Law we may not recommend a repairer unless you expressly request such
information. Unless you have already
asked us to recommend a repair shop, you must sign the attached Section 2610
of the Insurance Law Disclosure Statement in order to enable us to make
such recommendation.
If your vehicle is
repaired at a repair shop recommended by us, the repair shop must issue a
written guarantee that any work performed in repairing your vehicle meets
generally accepted standards for safe and proper repairs. If our recommended repairer does not honor
its written guarantee, we will restore your vehicle to its pre‑accident
condition within a reasonable time at no additional cost to you.
Your policy covers you
for reasonable expenses you incur in order to protect your motor vehicle from
further damage after a loss. Contact us
immediately for information as to what extent such expenses are covered. NYS APD I
[INSURANCE COMPANY LETTERHEAD]
SECTION 2610 OF THE INSURANCE LAW
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Section 2610 of the New
York State Insurance Law provides that the insurance carrier shall not require
that repairs be made in a particular place or shop or by a particular concern.
The Law further
provides that the Insurance Company shall not recommend or suggest repairs be
made in a particular place or shop or by a particular concern, unless expressly
requested by you.
I acknowledge receipt
of a copy of this notice.
_________________________________ _______________
DATE SIGNATURE
INSURED/VEHICLE OWNER
I have read the above
notice and understand the Insurance Company cannot require or recommend that
repairs be made in a particular place or by a particular person unless I
expressly request such recommendation.
I hereby, of my own volition, request that the Insurance Company or its
representative recommend a repair shop.
__________________________ ________________
DATE SIGNATURE
INSURED/VEHICLE OWNER
(ii) The insurer must furnish the insured or the
designated representative, at the express request of either, with the name and
address of a New York State registered motor vehicle repairer, properly
equipped to complete the repairs on the damaged motor vehicle (back‑up
shop), at a location reasonably convenient to the insured, who will repair the
damaged motor vehicle at the insurer's estimated cost of repair. A location reasonably convenient to the
insured shall mean: in Nassau, Suffolk and Westchester Counties and cities with
100,000 or more population, 10 miles‑and in all other areas of the State,
25 miles‑from the place where the motor vehicle is principally garaged;
or the location of the insured's repair facility. This mileage limitation shall not apply when a repair facility
properly equipped to complete the repairs is not available within the above
geographical area. In such a case a
properly equipped facility must be selected at a location as close as possible
to the above definition of reasonably convenient to the insured. The insurer must furnish the insured, upon
request, with a statement from the back‑up shop that it will repair the
vehicle in a manner consistent with the insurer's estimate for the amount
estimated by the insurer to repair the damaged vehicle.
Sec. 216.7(15) (i)(ii)(iii)
If the insured's motor
vehicle is repaired at a repair shop recommended by the insurer, for a sum
estimated by the insurer as the reasonable cost to repair the vehicle, the
insurer:
(i) shall select a repair shop that issues
written guarantees that any work performed in repairing damaged motor vehicles
meets generally accepted standards for safe and proper repairs;
(ii) shall cause the damaged vehicle to be
restored to its condition prior to the loss, at no additional cost to the
insured and within a reasonable time, if the repair shop it recommended does
not repair the damaged motor vehicle in accordance with generally accepted
standards for safe and proper repair; and
(iii) shall retain in
its claim file a signed section 2610 of the Insurance Law Disclosure Statement
(NYS APD I‑a), contained in section 216.12 of this Part, (see page 6) or
other written documentation that the insured requested recommendation of a
repair facility. If the insured has
verbally requested a recommendation of a repair facility prior to the issuance of
the prescribed Notice of Rights form, the requirement for written proof of
referral shall be satisfied by a notation in the claim files as to the date of
such request and the identity of the person to whom such request was made. The requirement of this subparagraph shall
not be applicable to a claim solely involving window glass.
II. INSPECTING THE DAMAGES
6. Q: Must
the insurance company inspect a damaged vehicle prior to repair?
A: Surprisingly, the answer is no. This is a
right, not an obligation, although most insurance companies do exercise the
right.
7. Q: If
an insurance company wishes to inspect the damage, when must the inspection
take place?
A: Within six (6) business days (i.e. days
other than Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays) from the notification to the
policyholder that an accident has taken place.
The inspection must be at a time and place reasonably convenient to the
policyholder. [Reg. 64, Sec.
216.7(b)(1)]
§216.7(b)(1)
(b) Adjustment of partial losses. (1)
If, upon notification of a loss, the insurer intends to exercise its
right to inspect damages prior to repair, it shall have six business days
following receipt of notice of claim to inspect the insured's damaged motor
vehicle, which is available for inspection, during normal business hours at a
place and time reasonably convenient to the insured. In addition, negotiations shall commence and a good faith offer
of settlement, sufficient to repair the vehicle to its condition immediately
prior to the loss, shall be made within the aforesaid six‑day period to
the designated representative, and it may also be made to the insured. If there is no designated representative,
the offer shall be made to the insured within the six‑day period.
8. Q: What happens if the insurance
company fails to inspect the damages during the six-day window of opportunity?
A: Assuming that the vehicle was available for
inspection during normal business hours throughout the six days, then the
insurance company forfeits its rights to inspect the damages prior to their
repair. In addition, the insurance
company's negotiation rights are limited to labor and the price of parts. It cannot dispute the existence of damages
or the method of repair. [Reg. 64, Sec.
216.7(b)(8)]
§216.7(b)(8)
(8) If the insurer fails to inspect the damaged
motor vehicle during the aforementioned six business‑day period, it shall
forfeit its right to inspect the damaged vehicle prior to repairs. Unless the insured or designated
representative shall permit an inspection after the six‑day period,
negotiations shall be limited to labor and the price of parts and shall not,
unless objective evidence to the contrary is provided by the insurer, involve
disputes as to the existence of damage or the chosen manner of repair. For the above forfeiture‑of‑inspection
provision to apply, the damaged vehicle must be available for inspection during
normal business hours for the entire aforementioned six‑business‑day
period.
9. Q:
Can an insurance company require that the policyholder obtain the
estimate?
A: Yes, but the insurance company is
responsible for the reasonable cost of such estimate, if any. In some cases, especially if there is minor
damage, the insurance company may pay off the cost of the repair shop's estimate. [Reg. 64, Sec. 216.7 (c)(9)(e)]
§216.7(c)(9)(e)
(e) Repair estimates. If an insurer requires that its insured
obtain an estimate or estimates of vehicle damage, the reasonable cost, if any,
of such estimates shall be borne by the insurer.
10. Q: Assuming there was an
inspection, when must the insurance company make its monetary offer to cover
the repairs?
A: Also within the six business day
period. The offer must be made in good
faith, meaning that it must be large enough to restore the vehicle to its
condition immediately prior to the accident.
[Reg. 64, Sec. 216.7(b)(1)]
§216.7(b)(1)
(b) Adjustment of partial losses. (1)
If, upon notification of a loss, the insurer intends to exercise its
right to inspect damages prior to repair, it shall have six business days
following receipt of notice of claim to inspect the insured's damaged motor
vehicle, which is available for inspection, during normal business hours at a
place and time reasonably convenient to the insured. In addition, negotiations shall commence and a good faith offer
of settlement, sufficient to repair the vehicle to its condition immediately
prior to the loss, shall be made within the aforesaid six‑day period to
the designated representative, and it may also be made to the insured. If there is no designated representative,
the offer shall be made to the insured within the six‑day period.
11. Q: To whom is the offer
made?
A: Either to the policyholder or the Designated
Representative (D.R.) [Reg. 64, Sec. 216.7(b)(1)].
§216.7(b)(1)
(b) Adjustment of partial losses. (1)
If, upon notification of a loss, the insurer intends to exercise its
right to inspect damages prior to repair, it shall have six business days
following receipt of notice of claim to inspect the insured's damaged motor
vehicle, which is available for inspection, during normal business hours at a
place and time reasonably convenient to the insured. In addition, negotiations shall commence and a good faith offer
of settlement, sufficient to repair the vehicle to its condition immediately
prior to the loss, shall be made within the aforesaid six‑day period to
the designated representative, and it may also be made to the insured. If there is no designated representative,
the offer shall be made to the insured within the six‑day period.
III. THE DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE
12. Q: Who can become a
Designated Representative (D.R.)?
A: A Designated Representative may be the
policyholder's broker, but it is more likely that it will be the repairer
chosen to fix the vehicle. [Reg. 64,
Sec. 216.7(a)(2)]
§216.7(a)(2)
(2) Designated representative (DR) shall
mean an insured's broker of record or an insured's intended repair shop
designated by the insured to represent the insured shop in negotiations with
the insurer in an attempt to settle the claim.
Such designated representative may legally act on the insured's
behalf. If the designated
representative is the insured's intended repair shop, such repair shop, if
located within New York State, must be registered pursuant to the provisions of
the Motor Vehicle Repair Shop Registration Act (article 12‑A, Vehicle and
Traffic Law), and may only represent the insured in negotiation of the amount
necessary to repair the insured's damaged vehicle. The designation form must contain the repairer's registration
number.
13. Q: How do I become a
Designated Representative?
A: Register with New York State under the Motor
Vehicle Repair Shop Registration Act (Article 12-A of the New York Vehicle and
Traffic Law). Get written proof
from the policyholder that you are acting on their behalf as the D.R. and
forward the written proof to the insurance company. [Reg. 64, 216.7(a)(2)]
§216.7(a)(2)
(2) Designated representative (DR) shall
mean an insured's broker of record or an insured's intended repair shop
designated by the insured to represent the insured shop in negotiations with
the insurer in an attempt to settle the claim.
Such designated representative may legally act on the insured's
behalf. If the designated representative
is the insured's intended repair shop, such repair shop, if located within New
York State, must be registered pursuant to the provisions of the Motor Vehicle
Repair Shop Registration Act (article 12‑A, Vehicle and Traffic Law), and
may only represent the insured in negotiation of the amount necessary to repair
the insured's damaged vehicle. The
designation form must contain the repairer's registration number.
14. Q: Does New York State
prescribe the wording of the designation form?
A: No.
However, NYSACT has distributed the recommended wording to its
membership, which is as follows:
|
Designated
Representative Authorization _______________________,
owner of a_____________________________ (owners name) (Year & make of vehicle) License
Plate#__________Appoints________________________#___________ (Repair facility) ( registration #) Located
at_____________________________________Phone_______________ as
my designated representative, as provided for in Regulation 64 of the New
York State Insurance Law, only as to my motor vehicle damage This is not an
authorization of repairs ________________________________ ______________ (signature) (date) |
15. Q: What is the
significance of becoming a Designated Representative?
A: The Designated Representative may legally
negotiate on behalf of the policyholder as respects the extent of the damage to
the vehicle and the amount necessary to repair it. [Reg. 64, Sec. 216.7(a)(2)]
§216.7(a)(2)
(2) Designated representative (DR) shall
mean an insured's broker of record or an insured's intended repair shop
designated by the insured to represent the insured shop in negotiations with
the insurer in an attempt to settle the claim.
Such designated representative may legally act on the insured's behalf. If the designated representative is the
insured's intended repair shop, such repair shop, if located within New York
State, must be registered pursuant to the provisions of the Motor Vehicle
Repair Shop Registration Act (article 12‑A, Vehicle and Traffic Law), and
may only represent the insured in negotiation of the amount necessary to repair
the insured's damaged vehicle. The
designation form must contain the repairer's registration number.
16. Q: Must the insurance
company negotiate with me after I send it the Designated Representative form?
A: Yes.
[Reg. 64, Sec. 216.7(b)(2)]
§216.7(a)(2)
(2) Designated representative (DR) shall
mean an insured's broker of record or an insured's intended repair shop
designated by the insured to represent the insured shop in negotiations with
the insurer in an attempt to settle the claim.
Such designated representative may legally act on the insured's
behalf. If the designated
representative is the insured's intended repair shop, such repair shop, if
located within New York State, must be registered pursuant to the provisions of
the Motor Vehicle Repair Shop Registration Act (article 12‑A, Vehicle and
Traffic Law), and may only represent the insured in negotiation of the amount
necessary to repair the insured's damaged vehicle. The designation form must contain the repairer's registration
number.
IV. THE INSURANCE COMPANY'S ESTIMATE
17. Q: What must the insurance
company's estimate include?
A: The insurance company's or their
representative's estimate shall include the following information at a
minimum:
(1) the name of the policyholder and or
owner/claimant;
(2) the owner/claimant's address and telephone
number;
(3) the name of the insurance company and the
name, address, license number and telephone number of the adjuster;
(4) the year, make, model, body style, mileage,
VIN number, color and condition of the damaged vehicle;
(5) the claim number;
(6) the date of accident; and
(7) the date the vehicle was inspected.
Each item must be
detailed as to the paint, parts and labor hours it will require for that
particular item. If the appraisal is
made at a repair shop, the registration number of the shop must be included on
the estimate form. [Reg. 64, Sec. 216.7(b)(13)]
§216.7(b)(13)
(13) Estimates of repairs prepared by insurers or
their representatives shall contain the following information at a minimum:
identity of policyholder and/or owner/claimant; owner/ claimant's address and
telephone number; identity of insurer, including name, address, license number
and telephone number of adjuster; year, make, model, body style, mileage, VIN,
license number, color and condition of the damaged vehicle. The estimate must also contain the claim
number, the date of accident and the date the vehicle was inspected. Each item of damage must be detailed as to
the paint, parts and labor hours it will require to repair that particular
item. If the appraisal is made at a
repair shop, the registration number of the shop must be included on the
estimate form.
The repair estimate
must also include as a separate line item, the reasonable cost for proper
disposal of liquid waste materials resulting from painting the vehicle and
restrictions when the insurance company specifies the use of non-OEM crash
parts (the latter is everything except windows and hubcaps). [Reg. 64, Sec. 216.7(b)(4) & (5)]
§216.7(b)(4) & (5)
(4) The insurer's repair estimate shall
include, as a separate line item, the reasonable cost for proper disposal of
waste material generated by painting the motor vehicle or crash part, in the following
manner (or using another method that is acceptable to the superintendent as
functionally equivalent):
(i) the cost per paint hour shall be
calculated by dividing the repair shop's annual disposal fees for such waste
material, after adjusting for reclaiming or recycling by the repair shop, by
the number of hours expended annually to paint vehicles;
(ii) the reasonable cost for proper disposal of
the waste material shall be calculated by multiplying the number of hours
estimated to paint the vehicle by the cost per paint hour;
(iii) presentation of
the manifest and invoice documenting a repair shop's disposal and disposal cost
for hazardous waste may be required by an insurer as a condition for this
separate line itemization, and the failure of the repair shop to provide such
documentation shall relieve the insurer from any consideration or inclusion of
such disposal cost on an itemized basis within the repair estimate;
(iv) the reasonable cost shall not exceed the
prevailing cost for such disposal in the geographic area of such repair; and
(v) a new repair shop
may use the prevailing cost for disposal of hazardous waste in its geographic
area during its first year in business.
(5) If the insurer's repair estimate is based
upon the use of any non‑OEM crash part:
(i) the estimate shall specify the non‑OEM,
or non‑OEM supplier;
(ii) the insurer shall not, without consent of
the insured or the insured's designated representative, specify non‑OEM
crash parts from more than three different suppliers for any one repair;
(iii) the crash part
shall equal or exceed the comparable OEM crash part in terms of fit, form,
finish, quality and performance;
(iv) the crash part must be warranted by the non‑OEM
at least to the extent and duration as the comparable OEM crash part;
(v) the insurer shall specify only certified
crash parts, in regard to any part that has been duly certified by a qualified
certifying entity acceptable to the superintendent;
(vi) if the crash part has not been certified by
a qualified certifying entity acceptable to the superintendent, the non‑OEM
must issue a written warranty, for at least the period of the insured's
ownership of the vehicle, that the crash part equals or exceeds the comparable
OEM crash part in terms of fit, form, finish, quality and performance; and
(vii) the insurer shall
cause the damaged vehicle to be restored to its pre-loss condition consistent
with the non‑OEM warranty, at no additional cost to the insured and
within a reasonable time, if the non‑OEM fails to honor its warranty
required in subparagraph (iv) or (vi) of this paragraph.
18. Q: Does the insurance
company have to pay for the disposal of waste material?
A: Yes, this must be separately reflected in
the repair estimate. [Reg.64, Sec.
216.7(b)(4)]
IMPORTANT: The insurance company is excused from this
requirement if it requests the manifest
and invoice documenting the disposal costs and you fail to provide it. [Reg. 64, Sec. 216.7(b)(4)]
§216.7(b)(4)
(4) The insurer's repair estimate shall include,
as a separate line item, the reasonable cost for proper disposal of waste
material generated by painting the motor vehicle or crash part, in the
following manner (or using another method that is acceptable to the
superintendent as functionally equivalent):
(i) the cost per paint hour shall be
calculated by dividing the repair shop's annual disposal fees for such waste
material, after adjusting for reclaiming or recycling by the repair shop, by
the number of hours expended annually to paint vehicles;
(ii) the reasonable cost for proper disposal of
the waste material shall be calculated by multiplying the number of hours
estimated to paint the vehicle by the cost per paint hour;
(iii) presentation of
the manifest and invoice documenting a repair shop's disposal and disposal cost
for hazardous waste may be required by an insurer as a condition for this
separate line itemization, and the failure of the repair shop to provide such
documentation shall relieve the insurer from any consideration or inclusion of
such disposal cost on an itemized basis within the repair estimate;
(iv) the reasonable cost shall not exceed the
prevailing cost for such disposal in the geographic area of such repair; and
(v) a new repair shop
may use the prevailing cost for disposal of hazardous waste in its geographic
area during its first year in business.
19. Q: My shop is brand
new. How can I provide figures
reflecting annual disposal fees?
A: New repair shops are allowed to use
prevailing costs in the geographic area. [Reg. 64, Sec. 216.7(b)(4)(v)]
§216.7(b)(4)(v)
(4) (v) a new repair shop may use the
prevailing cost for disposal of hazardous waste in its geographic area during
its first year in business.
V. NON-ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT PARTS
20. Q: Can an insurance
company, in its estimate, require the use of non-original equipment
manufacturer (non-OEM) replacement parts?
A: Yes.
However:
(1) the estimate must specify either the non-OEM
or the non-OEM supplier;
(2) the estimate may not specify non-OEM crash
parts from more than three different suppliers unless you agree to this;
(3) the non-OEM crash parts must have a warranty
at least as long and as extensive as that given by the original equipment
manufacturer and the parts must equal or exceed the original equipment in terms
of fit, finish and performance; and
(4) the insurance company shall specify only
crash parts that have been certified by an organization approved by the
Insurance Department (if you are in doubt, ask the insurance company to provide
you with proof that the certifying agency has been so approved). [Reg. 64, Sec. 216.7 (b)(5)]
§216.7(b)(5)
(5) If the insurer's repair estimate is based
upon the use of any non‑OEM crash part:
(i) the estimate shall specify the non‑OEM,
or non‑OEM supplier;
(ii) the insurer shall not, without consent of
the insured or the insured's designated representative, specify non‑OEM
crash parts from more than three different suppliers for any one repair;
(iii) the crash part
shall equal or exceed the comparable OEM crash part in terms of fit, form,
finish, quality and performance;
(iv) the crash part must be warranted by the non‑OEM
at least to the extent and duration as the comparable OEM crash part;
(v) the insurer shall specify only certified
crash parts, in regard to any part that has been duly certified by a qualified
certifying entity acceptable to the superintendent;
(vi) if the crash part has not been certified by
a qualified certifying entity acceptable to the superintendent, the non‑OEM
must issue a written warranty, for at least the period of the insured's
ownership of the vehicle, that the crash part equals or exceeds the comparable
OEM crash part in terms of fit, form, finish, quality and performance; and
(vii) the insurer shall
cause the damaged vehicle to be restored to its pre-loss condition consistent
with the non‑OEM warranty, at no additional cost to the insured and
within a reasonable time, if the non‑OEM fails to honor its warranty
required in subparagraph (iv) or (vi) of this paragraph.
21. Q: What if the non-OEM
part is not certified by an approved agency?
A: Amazingly, the insurance company can still
require its use if the manufacturer issues an ironclad warranty that the crash
part equals or exceeds the comparable OEM crash part in terms of fit, form,
finish, quality and performance and the warranty lasts as long as the insured
owns or leases the vehicle. [Reg. 64,
Sec. 216.7(b)(5)(vi)]
§216.7(b)(5)(vi) and
(vii)
(5) If the insurer's repair estimate is based
upon the use of any non‑OEM crash part:
(vi) if the crash part has not been certified by
a qualified certifying entity acceptable to the superintendent, the non‑OEM
must issue a written warranty, for at least the period of the insured's
ownership of the vehicle, that the crash part equals or exceeds the comparable
OEM crash part in terms of fit, form, finish, quality and performance; and
(vii) the insurer shall
cause the damaged vehicle to be restored to its pre-loss condition consistent
with the non‑OEM warranty, at no additional cost to the insured and
within a reasonable time, if the non‑OEM fails to honor its warranty
required in subparagraph (iv) or (vi) of this paragraph.
Just because the part
comes with an ironclad warranty does not necessarily mean that the part meets
or exceeds the comparable OEM crash part in terms of fit, form, finish, quality
and performance. In that case, the
insurance company shall cause the damaged vehicle to be restored to its
pre-loss condition, consistent with the non-OEM warranty, at no additional cost
to the policyholder, and within a reasonable time, if the non-OEM fails to
honor its warranty as required in the regulation. [Reg. 64, Sec. 216.7(b)(5)(vii)]
§216.7(b)(5)(vi) and
(vii)
(5) If the insurer's repair estimate is based
upon the use of any non‑OEM crash part:
(vi) if the crash part has not been certified by
a qualified certifying entity acceptable to the superintendent, the non‑OEM
must issue a written warranty, for at least the period of the insured's
ownership of the vehicle, that the crash part equals or exceeds the comparable
OEM crash part in terms of fit, form, finish, quality and performance; and
(vii) the insurer shall
cause the damaged vehicle to be restored to its pre-loss condition consistent
with the non‑OEM warranty, at no additional cost to the insured and
within a reasonable time, if the non‑OEM fails to honor its warranty
required in subparagraph (iv) or (vi) of this paragraph.
VI. DISCOVERING HIDDEN DAMAGE
22. Q: What if I discover
additional damage once I start the work?
A: The insurance
company can require that a second inspection be conducted in order to evaluate
open items on the estimate or to confirm the existence of additional damage
discovered after beginning the repair work.
[Reg. 64, Sec. 216.7(b)(9)]
§216.7(b)(9)
(9) If a second inspection of the vehicle is
required by the insurer in order to evaluate open items on the original
estimate, or hidden damage discovered upon commencement of repairs, such
inspection shall be performed within two business days following the date of
notice of additional or hidden damage from either the insured or the DR. When repairs are sublet by the original
repairer, thereby necessitating a reinspection at a location other than the
original repairer's location, such reinspection must take place within four
business days' notice, from either the insured or the DR, of additional or
hidden damage. At the time of the
subsequent inspection, the insurer shall furnish a copy of the insurer's
detailed written estimate of the cost of repairing the damages resulting from
the loss, specifying all appropriate deductions.
23. Q: When
must the second inspection take place?
A: Within two business days, following the
date, of the insurance company receiving notice of the discovery of additional
damage. If the reinspection is for
sublet repairs at a location different from the original repairer's location,
the second inspection must take place within four business days of the notice. [Reg. 64, Sec. 216.7(b)(9)]
§216.7(b)(9)
(9) If a second inspection of the vehicle is
required by the insurer in order to evaluate open items on the original
estimate, or hidden damage discovered upon commencement of repairs, such
inspection shall be performed within two business days following the date of
notice of additional or hidden damage from either the insured or the DR. When repairs are sublet by the original
repairer, thereby necessitating a reinspection at a location other than the
original repairer's location, such reinspection must take place within four
business days' notice, from either the insured or the DR, of additional or
hidden damage. At the time of the
subsequent inspection, the insurer shall furnish a copy of the insurer's detailed
written estimate of the cost of repairing the damages resulting from the loss,
specifying all appropriate deductions.
VII. ALLOWABLE DEDUCTIONS
24. Q:
Other than the policy's cash deductible, what deductions may the
insurance company make ?
A: Insurance companies may take deductions for
betterment or depreciation, but only for those parts normally subject to repair
and replacement during the normal life of the vehicle. Also, bear in mind that the insurance
company's deductions are generally
limited to the amount by which the resale value of the vehicle is increased by
the repair or replacement. [Reg. 64,
Sec. 216.7(b)(11)]
§216.7(b)(11)
(11) Deductions for
betterment and/or depreciation are permitted only for parts normally subject to
repair and replacement during the useful life of the insured motor
vehicle. Deductions for betterment
and/or depreciation shall be limited to the lesser of:
(i) an amount equal to the proportion that the
expired life of the part, to be repaired or replaced, bears to the normal
useful life of that part; or
(ii) the amount by which the resale value of the
motor vehicle is increased by the repair or replacement. Calculations for betterment, depreciation
and normal useful life must be included in the insurer's claim file.
25. Q:
What about deductions for previous damage or the vehicle's prior overall
condition?
A: These are permitted as well, but they must
be measurable, discernible, itemized and specified as to dollar amount. They must be detailed in the claim file and,
like deductions for betterment and depreciation, the amount deducted is limited
to the amount by which the resale value of the vehicle is increased by the
repair. [Reg. 64, Sec. 216.7(b)(12)]
§216.7(b)(12)
(12) Deductions for previous damage or prior
condition of the motor vehicle must be measurable, discernible, itemized and
specified as to dollar amount, and such deductions must be detailed in the
claim file. Such deductions shall be
limited to the amount by which the resale value of the motor vehicle is
increased by the elimination of the previous damage or the correction of the
prior condition.
VIII. GETTING PAID
26. Q:
Does Regulation 64 address how and when payment of the claim is to be
made?
A: Yes.
The insurer must mail or hand deliver the check to the insured or to you
(if you are the D.R.) within five business days after the insurance company's
settlement offer has been accepted
[Reg. 64, Sec. 216.7(b)(16)].
§216.7(b)(16)
(16) The insurer must mail or hand‑deliver
its payment to the insured or the designated representative within five
business days after the insured has accepted the insurer's offer, or three
business days after the receipt of a completed proof of loss.
Even if you are not the
D.R. you may be paid directly if:
(1) Your customer has directed the insurance
company in writing to do so;
(2) You have completed the repairs; and
(3) You have filled out the Certification of
Automobile Repairs form (NYS APD 2) below.
form (NYS APD2)]
CERTIFICATION
OF AUTOMOBILE REPAIR
(TO
BE COMPLETED BY INSURER)
INSERT: INSURED_________________________
INSURER'S NAME CLAIM
#_________________________
INSURER'S ADDRESS POLICY
#________________________
DATE
OF ACCIDENT______________
DEDUCTIBLE
$___________________
Section 3411 (i) of the
NEW YORK INSURANCE LAW (NYIL) and Article 12‑A of the Vehicle and Traffic
Law (V&TL) require that the following certification be completed and signed
by both the insured and the automobile repairer. These laws also require submission of the repair invoice (Paid
Bill) by the automobile repairer or the insured to the insurer whenever any
repairs are made. The NYIL does not
require an insured to repair the automobile as a condition of payment of a
loss. This form must be completed and
returned to the insurer within 45 days.
A postage‑paid return envelope has been furnished for your
convenience.
ANY PERSON WHO,
KNOWINGLY ASSISTS, ABETS, SOLICITS OR CONSPIRES WITH ANOTHER TO MAKE A FALSE
REPORT OF THE THEFT, DESTRUCTION, DAMAGE OR CONVERSION OF ANY MOTOR VEHICLE TO
A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, THE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES OR AN INSURANCE
COMPANY, COMMITS A FRAUDULENT INSURANCE ACT, WHICH IS A CRIME, AND SHALL ALSO
BE SUBJECT TO A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS AND THE VALUE
OF THE SUBJECT MOTOR VEHICLE OR STATED CLAIM FOR EACH VIOLATION.
PART
I
TO BE
COMPLETED BY THE INSURED:
I,
______________________________________ certify, under penalties of perjury,
that:
(print your name)
Check A or B
_____A. I have not made any repairs to my automobile
as a result of this loss.
_____B. I have made repairs to my automobile and I
have attached a copy of my invoice for repairs to my automobile as a result of
the captioned loss.
IMPORTANT
NOTICE TO INSURED
IF THIS CERTIFICATION IS
NOT COMPLETED AND RETURNED, TOGETHER WITH A COPY OF THE ITEMIZED PAID BILL, IT
WILL BE ASSUMED THAT YOU DID NOT REPAIR YOUR MOTOR VEHICLE. IF YOU HAVE A SUBSEQUENT LOSS, THE COMPANY
MUST, TO THE EXTENT RELEVANT, DEDUCT SUCH UNREPAIRED ITEMS AS PREVIOUS DAMAGE
IN SETTLING A FUTURE LOSS. IF YOU DO
NOT REPAIR ALL THE DAMAGES ALLOWED BY THE INSURER, SUCH REPAIRS NOT PERFORMED
MAY REDUCE YOUR SETTLEMENT OF ANY FUTURE LOSS.
THEREFORE, IF AFTER SIGNING THIS CERTIFICATION, YOU REPAIR ANY DAMAGE
CAUSED BY THIS ACCIDENT, YOU SHOULD NOTIFY THE COMPANY IMMEDIATELY. THE COMPANY MAY AT THAT TIME ELECT TO
INSPECT YOUR AUTOMOBILE.
_________________________ _____________________________________________
DATE SIGNATURE OF INSURED
PART
II
TO BE COMPLETED BY THE
AUTOMOBILE REPAIRER:
I, ____________ owner or
officer of____________________________ shop
(print your name) (print
name of auto repair)
Auto Repair Shop
Registration Number ______ ______, located at _________________ certify, under
penalties of perjury, that I have made the repairs to the automobile owned by
______________________
(print name of insured),
as shown on the attached
itemized invoice. I further certify
that:
Check A or B
______A. I have repaired all the items allowed by the
insurer, or, if not,
______B. I have repaired the automobile as described
on the attached itemized invoice.
________________________ ________________________________________________
DATE SIGNATURE
OF REPAIRER
(Owner or Officer)
The insurance company
must provide a postage paid return envelope for you to send back the
certification. [Reg. 64, Sec.
216.7(b)(16)-(18)]
§216.7(b)(16)-(18)
(16) The insurer must mail or hand‑deliver
its payment to the insured or the designated representative within five
business days after the insured has accepted the insurer's offer, or three
business days after the receipt of a completed proof of loss.
(17) The insured shall have the right to receive
the proceeds of any settlement in accordance with policy provisions. However, if the insured agrees and this
agreement is documented in the claim file, the insurer may make the check or
draft payable to the insured and the lienholder and/or the insured's designated
repairer. An insurer may not condition
payment of a loss upon repair of the automobile or receipt of a completed
Certification of Automobile Repairs.
(18) The following
additional standards shall be applicable to the settlement of private passenger
automobile physical damage claims:
(i) Subsequent to payment of the claim, the
insurer, in accordance with the provisions of section 3411(i) of the Insurance
Law, may request that the automobile be made available for inspection, whether
or not the automobile is repaired. The
inspection shall be conducted at a time and place reasonably convenient to the
insured. The inspection report shall be
retained in the insurer's claim file.
(ii) An insurer shall request submission of a
Certification of Automobile Repairs (NYS APD 2), as contained in section 216.12
of this Part, signed and certified by the insured and the automobile repairer,
under penalties of perjury, stating whether all items allowed by the insurer
have been repaired and, if not, that repairs were made in accordance with the
repairer's invoice. This form, together
with a postage‑paid return envelope, shall be given to the insured or the
insured's designated representative by the insurer during the course of
negotiation of the settlement amount.
(iii) The provisions of
section 3411(i) of the Insurance Law, with respect to certification and repair
invoices, do not apply where the amount of damage to the insured automobile is
less than the deductible applicable to the policy.
27. Q:
Does the insurance company have a right to inspect the vehicle after repairs
have been completed?
A: Absolutely.
In fact, this right of inspection exists even if the repairs have not
been made. The insurance company cannot condition payment of the claim upon
repairs being made unless the policyholder orders that you be paid
directly. [Reg. 216.7(b)(18)(i)]
§216.7(b)(18)(i)
(18) The following
additional standards shall be applicable to the settlement of private passenger
automobile physical damage claims:
(i) Subsequent to payment of the claim, the
insurer, in accordance with the provisions of section 3411(i) of the Insurance
Law, may request that the automobile be made available for inspection, whether
or not the automobile is repaired. The
inspection shall be conducted at a time and place reasonably convenient to the
insured. The inspection report shall be
retained in the insurer's claim file.
PART 2: TOTAL LOSSES
I. CASH SETTLEMENT METHODS
28. Q: If
the insurance company determines that the cost of repair exceeds the vehicle's
current value, how is its offer of settlement calculated?
A: There are three possible methods:
(1) By averaging the
retail values of a substantially similar vehicle as listed in The Redbook (National Market Reports,
Inc.) and The N.A.D.A. Official Used Car
Guide (National Automobile Dealers Used Car Guide Company) less
applicable deductibles as well as up to $100.00 for dealer prep charges; or
(2) By obtaining a price quote from a qualified
dealer located no more than 25 miles from the place where the totaled vehicle
was principally garaged. However, the
VIN must be communicated in writing to the policyholder and the dealer must
make the vehicle available for purchase by the policyholder for three calendar
days; or
(3) By obtaining a quotation from an Insurance
Department-approved computerized data base.
[Reg. 64, Sec. 216.7 (c)(1)(i-iii)]
§216.7(c)(1)(i)-(iii)
(c) Adjustment of total losses. (1) If the
insurer elects to make a cash settlement, its minimum offer, subject to
applicable deductions, must be one of the following:
(i) The average of the retail values for a
substantially similar vehicle as listed in two valuation manuals current at the
date of loss and approved by this department.
Manuals approved for use are‑The Redbook, published by National
Market Reports Inc., and The N.A.D.A. Official Used Car Guide, published by the
National Automobile Dealers Used Car Guide Company. The use of other manuals may be approved by this department upon
demonstration of need and suitability.
If it is evident that an option has not been considered in either or
both of the above valuation manuals, the insurer shall consider the value, if
any, of such option in arriving at the vehicle's value and shall utilize the
best available method to value such option.
The insurer may deduct documented, reasonable dealer preparation
charges, up to $100, from the average of the retail values. The insurer shall provide to the insured, no
later than the date of payment of the claim, a detailed copy of its calculation
of the insured vehicle's total loss value, including the valuation of options
which are not considered in the base price of the vehicle.
(ii) A quotation for a substantially similar
vehicle, obtained by the insurer from a qualified dealer located reasonably
convenient to the insured. A reasonable
location shall be within 25 miles of the place of principal garagement of the
motor vehicle. The substantially
similar available vehicle must remain available for purchase by the insured for
a period of three calendar days subsequent to receipt of notice of its
availability by the insured, and the insured must be able to purchase the
substantially similar vehicle at the quoted dealer for the insurer's cash offer
plus applicable deductions. The insurer
must maintain in its claim file the dealer's name and location, the vehicle
identification number, the dealer stock number, the mileage and the major
options for the substantially similar vehicle which was the basis of its
quote. The notice to the insured of the
availability of a substantially similar vehicle must be sent by certified mail,
return receipt requested, or be a sound‑recorded conversation reflecting
the date of notice. The three calendar
days commence on the date the insured acknowledges receipt of notice. The insured need not purchase the vehicle
used as the basis of the insurer's quotation, since the quotation merely serves
as a basis for the insurer's offer. The
foregoing period is satisfied at the point an insured physically verifies the
existence of the substantially similar available vehicle used as the basis of
the insurer's quotation. Should the
insurer's research of substantially similar vehicles determine that the retail
values contained in the valuation manuals, prescribed in subparagraph (i) of
this paragraph, are inadequate to purchase a substantially similar vehicle, the
insurer's offer should be the amount determined by such research.
(iii) A quotation
obtained from a computerized database, approved by the superintendent, that
produces statistically valid fair market values for a substantially similar
vehicle, within the local market area that meets all the following minimum
criteria:
(a) it shall produce values for at least 85
percent of all makes and models of private passenger automobiles, as defined in
section 67.1(a) of this Title, for the last 15 model years, and shall take into
account the values of all major options for such vehicles:
(b) it shall rely upon values derived from
licensed dealers, which have minimum sales of 100 motor vehicles per year in
the local market area for all vehicles of seven model years or less of age, and
be based upon the physical inventory of vehicles sold within the 90 days prior
to the loss and vehicles which are available; and
(c) it shall monitor the average retail price of
private passenger automobiles when there is insufficient data or inventory
available from licensed dealers to ensure statistically valid local market area
values.
29. Q:
What is meant by a substantially similar vehicle?
A: A substantially similar vehicle is a vehicle
of the same make, model, year and condition (including all major options) as
the insured vehicle. A substantially
similar vehicle's mileage must not exceed that of the insured vehicle by more
than 4,000 miles or 10% of the mileage on the vehicle as of the date of the
loss, whichever is greater. [Reg.64,
Sec. 216.7 (a)(4)]
§216.7(a) (4)
(4) Substantially similar vehicle shall
mean a vehicle of the same make, model, year and condition, including all major
options of the insured vehicle. Mileage
must not exceed that of the insured vehicle by more than 4,000 miles or 10
percent of the mileage on the vehicle at the date of loss, whichever is
greater.
30. Q: Must the policyholder
buy the replacement vehicle from the dealer that provided the quote?
A: No.
This merely serves as the basis for the insurance company's offer. [Reg. 64, Sec. 216.7 (c)(1)(ii)]
§216.7(c)(1)(ii)
(ii) A quotation for a substantially similar
vehicle, obtained by the insurer from a qualified dealer located reasonably
convenient to the insured. A reasonable
location shall be within 25 miles of the place of principal garagement of the
motor vehicle. The substantially
similar available vehicle must remain available for purchase by the insured for
a period of three calendar days subsequent to receipt of notice of its
availability by the insured, and the insured must be able to purchase the
substantially similar vehicle at the quoted dealer for the insurer's cash offer
plus applicable deductions. The insurer
must maintain in its claim file the dealer's name and location, the vehicle
identification number, the dealer stock number, the mileage and the major
options for the substantially similar vehicle which was the basis of its quote. The notice to the insured of the
availability of a substantially similar vehicle must be sent by certified mail,
return receipt requested, or be a sound‑recorded conversation reflecting
the date of notice. The three calendar
days commence on the date the insured acknowledges receipt of notice. The insured need not purchase the vehicle
used as the basis of the insurer's quotation, since the quotation merely serves
as a basis for the insurer's offer. The
foregoing period is satisfied at the point an insured physically verifies the
existence of the substantially similar available vehicle used as the basis of
the insurer's quotation. Should the
insurer's research of substantially similar vehicles determine that the retail
values contained in the valuation manuals, prescribed in subparagraph (i) of
this paragraph, are inadequate to purchase a substantially similar vehicle, the
insurer's offer should be the amount determined by such research.
31. Q: What happens if the
totaled vehicle was purchased less that 180 days before the loss and the use of
any of the above three valuation methods would result in a settlement greater
than the original price including options?
A: When this unusual event occurs, the
insurance company has the right to limit the settlement to the actual purchase price. [Reg. 64, Sec. 216.7 (c)(1)(iv)]
§216.7(c)(1)(iv)
(iv) If the method used in subparagraph (i), (ii)
or (iii) of this paragraph would result in a settlement offer greater than the
purchase price plus the cost of substantiated improvements paid by the insured
for a vehicle purchased within the 180 calendar days prior to date of loss, the
insurer's offer of settlement may be limited to the purchase price, plus the
cost of any substantiated improvements, less the deductible. This method of settlement shall not be
applicable to motor vehicles acquired by the insured through a private sale or
as a gift. A private sale is one in
which the seller does not engage in the sale of motor vehicles as an
occupation.
II. VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
32. Q: Does the insurance
company have the right to physically replace the vehicle, as opposed to issuing
a check for its actual value at the time of the total loss?
A: Yes, but only if the replacement vehicle is
immediately available. The insurance
company cannot compel the policyholder to wait weeks before a substantially
similar vehicle is located. [Reg. 64,
Sec. 216.7 (c)(2)].
§216.7(c)(2)
(2) If the insurer elects to replace the
vehicle, the replacement vehicle must be an immediately available,
substantially similar vehicle that is both furnished and paid for by the
insurer, subject to the deductible if any.
III. ALLOWABLE DEPRECIATION
33. Q: Since new vehicles,
with rare exceptions, lose value as soon as they are driven away from the
dealership, are insurance companies entitled to deduct an amount for
depreciation from the final settlement?
A: In almost all instances, the answer is
yes. Assuming the vehicle was a private
passenger type (a four-wheel car, sport utility vehicle, noncommercial van,
pick-up truck, etc.) that, when purchased, was yet to be replaced by a newer
model prior to the time of loss, then the insurance company may take
depreciation into account as follows:
Purchase Price Depreciation/Mile
Up to $10,000 $.15
$10,001 to $15,000 $.20
$15,001 to $20,000 $.25
$20,001 to $25,000 $.30
$25,001 to $30,000 $.37
$30,001 to $35,000 $.45
More than $35,000 $.53
[Reg. 64, Sec. 216.7
(c)(3)]
§216.7(c)(3)
(3) A private passenger automobile of the
current model year means a current model year automobile that has not been
superseded in the marketplace by an officially introduced succeeding model, or
an automobile of the previous model year purchased new within 90 days prior to
the date of loss. If the insured
vehicle is a private passenger automobile of the current model year, the
insurer shall pay to the insured the reasonable purchase price to the insured
on the date of loss of a new identical vehicle, less any applicable deductible
and an allowance for depreciation in accordance with the schedule below, except
where the utilization of this method of settlement would result in a lower
claim payment as compared with the utilization of the methods described in
subparagraphs (1)(i), (ii) and (iii) of this subdivision.
DEPRECIATION SCHEDULE
Purchase price
Depreciation per mile
Up to $10,000
$.15
$10,001 to $15,000
.20
$15,001 to $20,000 .25
$20,001 to $25,000 .30
$25,001 to $30,000
.37
$30,001 to $35,000 .45
More than $35,000 .53
34. Q: Does the above schedule
apply if, say, a 1997 Pontiac was bought new after the 98 models came out?
A: Yes, as long as the total loss occurred
within 90 days of the purchase. [Reg.
64, Sec. 216.7 (c)(3)]
§216.7(c)(3)
(3) A private passenger automobile of the
current model year means a current model year automobile that has not been
superseded in the marketplace by an officially introduced succeeding model, or
an automobile of the previous model year purchased new within 90 days prior to
the date of loss. If the insured vehicle
is a private passenger automobile of the current model year, the insurer shall
pay to the insured the reasonable purchase price to the insured on the date of
loss of a new identical vehicle, less any applicable deductible and an
allowance for depreciation in accordance with the schedule below, except where
the utilization of this method of settlement would result in a lower claim
payment as compared with the utilization of the methods described in
subparagraphs (1)(i), (ii) and (iii) of this subdivision.
35. Q: Are there any instances
in which an insurance company is barred from depreciating the value of a new
car that has been totaled?
A: Yes, but only if the use of the depreciation
schedule would result in a lower settlement than that called for under one of
the three valuation methods described in Section 1 of this Part. [Reg. 64, Sec. 216.7 (c)(3)]
§216.7(c)(3)
(3) A private passenger automobile of the
current model year means a current model year automobile that has not been
superseded in the marketplace by an officially introduced succeeding model, or
an automobile of the previous model year purchased new within 90 days prior to
the date of loss. If the insured
vehicle is a private passenger automobile of the current model year, the
insurer shall pay to the insured the reasonable purchase price to the insured
on the date of loss of a new identical vehicle, less any applicable deductible
and an allowance for depreciation in accordance with the schedule below, except
where the utilization of this method of settlement would result in a lower
claim payment as compared with the utilization of the methods described in
subparagraphs (1)(i), (ii) and (iii) of this subdivision.
IV. RIGHT OF RECOURSE
36. Q: What if the
policyholder claims that he cannot buy a comparable vehicle for the amount of
the received settlement check?
A: Then the insurance company must either:
(1) Offer the policyholder an amount sufficient
to close the gap;
or
(2) With the permission of the policyholder,
locate a comparable vehicle and make up the difference, if any.
The insurance company
has the discretion to decide which of these two options to elect. [Reg. 64, Sec. 216.7 (c)(4)]
§216.7(c)(4)
(4) Right of recourse. If, within 35 calendar days after mailing of
the claim payment, the insured notifies the insurer in writing that the insured
cannot purchase a comparable vehicle for the market value, as determined under
the provisions of subparagraph (1)(i), (ii), (iii) or (v) or paragraph (3) of
this subdivision, the insurer shall reopen its claim file and shall offer, in
its discretion and subject to applicable deductions, one of the following
options to the insured:
(i) the insurer shall identify and offer for
settlement an amount sufficient to purchase a substantially similar vehicle, as
provided in subparagraph (1)(ii) of this subdivision; or
(ii) the insurer shall pay the insured the
difference between the amount of its claim payment and the cost of a
substantially similar vehicle, as provided in subparagraph (1)(ii) of this
subdivision, located by the insured, or the insurer, upon consent of the
insured, may purchase that vehicle for the insured.
37. Q: Does the policyholder
have to take any actions to preserve this right of recourse?
A: Yes.
The policyholder must notify the insurance company in writing that a
comparable vehicle cannot be purchased for the amount of the settlement
check. This notice must be given within
five weeks (35 days) of the date that the settlement check was mailed by the
insurance company. In addition, if the
insurance company had previously located a comparable vehicle, had informed the
policyholder of this fact in writing (including the VIN), and the vehicle was
available for purchase for a full three days, then the policyholder will be
deemed to have forfeited this right of recourse. [Reg. 64, Sec. 216.7 (c)(4) & (5)]
§216.7(c)(4)&(5)
(4) Right of recourse. If, within 35 calendar days after mailing of
the claim payment, the insured notifies the insurer in writing that the insured
cannot purchase a comparable vehicle for the market value, as determined under
the provisions of subparagraph (1)(i), (ii), (iii) or (v) or paragraph (3) of
this subdivision, the insurer shall reopen its claim file and shall offer, in
its discretion and subject to applicable deductions, one of the following
options to the insured:
(i) the insurer shall identify and offer for
settlement an amount sufficient to purchase a substantially similar vehicle, as
provided in subparagraph (1)(ii) of this subdivision; or
(ii) the insurer shall pay the insured the
difference between the amount of its claim payment and the cost of a
substantially similar vehicle, as provided in subparagraph (1)(ii) of this
subdivision, located by the insured, or the insurer, upon consent of the
insured, may purchase that vehicle for the insured.
(5) The insurer shall not be required to take
action under paragraph (4) of this subdivision if its documentation to the
insured at the time of its final offer included written notification of the
availability of a substantially similar vehicle, as provided in subparagraph
(1)(ii) of this subdivision, which shall have been available for at least three
calendar days subsequent to the insured's receipt of that offer. The documentation shall include the vehicle
identification number, the stock number or order number.
V. SALVAGE VALUE
38. Q: When may an insurance
company deduct from the final settlement the salvage value of the totaled
vehicle?
A: The insurance company may deduct the salvage
value if it obtains the name and address of a licensed or certified salvage
dealer who agrees to purchase the wreck for the amount deducted, with no
additional charges to the policyholder.
This information must be provided to the policyholder upon request. [Reg.64, Sec 216.7 (c)(6)]
§216.7(c)(6)
(6) If the insurer in the process of adjusting
a total loss makes a deduction for the salvage value of the insured vehicle,
the insurer must furnish the insured, upon the insured's request, with the name
and address of a licensed or certified salvage dealer or dismantler who will
purchase the salvage for the amount deducted with no additional charges to the
insured by the salvage dealer or dismantler.
39. Q:
Can the policyholder retain title to the totaled vehicle as part of the
claim settlement?
A: Absolutely, as long as the salvage value of
the vehicle amounts to more than 10% of the actual cash value of the vehicle
immediately prior to the loss. When
this is not the case, then the insurance company is legally entitled to have
title endorsed over to it after payment of the claim. However, if the insurance company is satisfied that the
policyholder intends to retain the vehicle for his or her own use, it can
permit the policyholder to keep the totaled vehicle as part of the claim
settlement whether or not the salvage value exceeds 10% of the vehicle's actual
cash value. [Reg. 64, Sec. 216.8
(f)(1)]
§216.8(f)(1)
(f) Salvage. Insurers shall, except where the insured is permitted to retain
the automobile as part of the claim settlement, take possession of the
certificate of title, properly endorsed to them, and take possession of the
salvage, if any, whenever a loss is determined by the insurer to be a total
loss or a constructive total loss.
Insurers, in disposing of the salvage, shall fully comply with the
requirements of section 429 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law.
(1) An insured shall not be permitted to retain
the insured vehicle if the salvage value of the vehicle after the loss
aggregates 10 percent or less of the actual cash value of the vehicle prior to
the loss, unless the insurer is satisfied that the insured intends to retain
the automobile for the insured's own use.
VI. THE 30-DAY SETTLEMENT RULE AND ITS
EXCEPTIONS
40. Q: Is the time frame for
settling total losses the same as the 30-day time frame for settling partial
losses?
A: Yes, except if there has been a total loss
due to theft, the insurance company has an additional five days to settle
up. The additional five days come into
play when the policyholder has failed to provide all requested information to
the insurance company by the 25th calendar day after the theft is
discovered. If that is the case, then
the insurance company has up to five additional days from receipt of all of the
requested information to make its offer of settlement. [Reg. 64, Sec. 216.7 (c)(7)]
§216.7(c)(7)
(7) All applicable provisions of subdivision
(b) of this section ("adjustment of partial losses") also shall apply
to the adjustment of total losses, except that the insurer shall be allowed an
additional five business days to comply with the requirements of paragraph (1)
of subdivision (b) of this section. In
the case of an unrecovered theft loss, except as provided in section 216.8 of
this Part, the insurer shall make its offer for the total loss no later than
the 25th calendar day following the notice of loss, if the insured has provided
all information that has been requested by the insurer that is necessary to
value the claim. If the insured has not
provided such information by the 25th calendar day following the notice of
loss, the insurer shall make its offer no later than the 5th business day
following receipt of such information.
41. Q:
How is the 30-day period measured?
A: The insurance company has up to 30 calendar
days (not business days) from the date it first receives notice of the loss to
either mail the settlement check or replace the damaged vehicle. [Reg. 64, Sec. 216.7 (d)(1)]
§216.7
(d)(1)
(d) Unreasonable delay. (1)
Unless clear justification exists, no more than 2O percent of a
representative sample of the physical damage claims selected by Insurance
Department examiners at any office or offices of the insurer shall have a
payment period in excess of 30 calendar days.
A payment period is the period between the date of receipt of notice of
loss by the insurer and:
(i) the date the settlement check is mailed;
or
(ii) the
date on which the damaged motor vehicle is replaced by the insurer.
If an
insurer is in violation of this overall standard, then each such claim in
excess of 30 calendar days may be treated as a separate violation.
42. Q:
When may an insurance company take more than 30 days to resolve a claim?
A: If it provides the policyholder with a
written explanation for the delay and the explanation is for a good faith
reason. Unless the claim is in
litigation, letters updating the situation shall be sent every 30 calendar days
until the claim is resolved. [Reg. 64,
Sec. 216.7 (d)(2)]
§216.7(d)(2)
(2) If any element of a physical damage claim
remains unresolved more than 30 calendar days from the date of receipt of
notice by the insurer, the insurer shall provide the insured with a written
explanation of the specific reasons for delay in the claim settlement. Unless the matter is in litigation, an updated
letter of explanation shall be sent every 30 calendar days thereafter until all
elements of the claim are either honored or rejected.
VII. LOSS OF USE
43. Q:
Is the policyholder entitled as a matter of right to be reimbursed by
the insurer for any additional transportation expenses, such as car rental,
after a partial or total loss?
A: No: the policyholder would have had to
purchase this additional coverage.
However, after the accident it is the insurance company's duty to notify
the policyholder in writing of the policyholder's benefits under the insurance
policy. [Reg. 64, Sec. 216.7 (f)]
§216.7(f)
(f) Loss of use. In the event of the theft of the entire
vehicle, it shall be the duty of the insurer at the time of notification of
loss to advise the insured of his right under the policy to be reimbursed for
transportation expenses. Such
notification must be confirmed in writing immediately after receipt of notice
of theft. All conditions and benefits
related to this coverage as stated in the policy must be contained in the
notification to the insured.
VIII. SUBROGATION
44. Q:
Is the policyholder entitled as a matter of right to share any recovery
that the insurance company may get from the third party responsible for the
physical damage loss? [This is called "subrogation"]
A: Yes.
If the policyholder has received his or her settlement less the policy
deductible, then the policyholder must share in the net recovery. [Reg. 64, Sec. 216.7 (g)(1)]
§216.7(g)(1)
(g) Subrogation agreements. (1)
Where an insured has received payment under a physical damage coverage
that is subject to a deductible, the insured shall share, pro rata, with the
insurer any net recovery received by the insurer from third parties. Within 30 calendar days of such recovery,
the insurer must mail or hand‑deliver to the insured its payment for the
insured's pro rata share of the recovery.
45. Q:
How is the policyholder's share of the net recovery computed?
A: It is a two-part formula as follows:
Net Recovery=Total Amount of the Recovery
Minus Insurance Company's Allocated Loss Adjustment Expenses
Insurance Company's Share of Net
Recovery=Policy Deductible Divided By Amount of the Total Loss; this is
then Multiplied By the Net Recovery.
[Reg. 64, Sec. 216.7 (g)(2)]
§216.7(g)(2)
(2) Net recovery shall be the total recovery
less the insurer's allocated loss adjustment expenses attributable to such
recovery. The formula for computing net
recovery and the insured's share of recovery of the deductible may be stated as
follows:
(i)
TOTAL
RECOVERY ‑ ALLOCATED LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSES = NET RECOVERY
(ii)
DEDUCTIBLE/TOTAL
LOSS X NET RECOVERY = INSURED'S SHARE OF NET RECOVERY
Application
of Formula: Assume a loss of $500 subject to a $100 deductible with $50 in
allocated loss adjustment expenses:
(a) if there is full recovery of $500:
computation
of net recovery: $500 ‑ $50 = $450
computation
of insured's share of recovery: $100/$500 x $450 = $90
(b) If there is a partial recovery of $300:
computation
of net recovery: $300 ‑ $50 = $250
computation
of insured's share of recovery: $100/$500 x $250 = $50
Here is an
example of how it works: Assume that
Policyholder Ted's car was rear ended by Bill's pickup truck. Total amount of the damage was $500.00. Ted had a $100.00 collision damage
deductible in his policy with Ajax Mutual.
Ajax paid $400.00 towards the vehicle repair and then recovered the
total amount of the damage ($500.00) from Bill's insurer. In doing so, Ajax incurred $50.00 in
expenses. Thus, the net recovery
is $450.00.
Policyholder
Ted is entitled to a portion of this $450.00 net recovery as follows: The deductible amount ($100.00) is divided
by the amount of the total loss ($500.00).
This yields 20 cents. Then
multiply that by the net recovery ($450.00).
This amount, $90.00, goes to Policyholder Ted, so he ends up recovering
90% of his deductible. Ajax meanwhile
recovers $360.00 of the $400.00 it had paid out on the claim, also 90%.
46. Q:
Must the insurance company keep the policyholder notified as to the
status of the claim for subrogation?
A: Yes.
Within 120 days from the date of the claim payment to the policyholder,
the insurance company shall mail out a status report. Updates shall be mailed out every 120 days thereafter. [Reg. 64, Sec. 216.7 (g)(5)]
§216.7(g)(5)
(5) If an insurer has paid a physical damage
claim that is subject to a deductible and it is pursuing its subrogation claim,
the insurer shall notify its insured in writing of the status of its claim 120
calendar days after the date of the claim payment to its insured. An updated status letter shall be sent every
120 calendar days thereafter until the claim is either honored or rejected.
47. Q:
When is the insurance company legally obligated to attempt recovery?
A: When the liability of the other driver is
clear. The only way that the insurance
company can get out of this obligation is if it returns the full amount of the
deductible to the policyholder. [Reg.
64, Sec. 216.7 (g)(3)]
§216.7(g)(3)
(3) Unless the insurer returns its insured's
full deductible, it shall attempt to effect full recovery in clear liability
cases and shall not enter into any inter-company agreements that provide for
the acceptance of lesser amounts on a formula basis.
48. Q:
What is the insurance company's obligation when the liability of the
other driver is not clear?
A: Then the insurance company has the
discretion whether to pursue a claim for subrogation. If it elects not to do so, then the insurance company must notify
the policyholder in writing of this within 60 days of its paying the
claim. If the insurance company fails
to do this, and the statute of limitations for pursuing the claim against the
third party has run out, then the insurance company is liable for refunding the
full amount of the deductible to the policyholder. [Reg. 64, Sec. 216.7 (g)(6)]
§216.7(g)(6)
(6) If an insurer has paid a physical damage
claim that is subject to a deductible and it elects not to pursue its
subrogation claim where the possibility of recovery exists, the insurer shall
so notify its insured in writing within 60 calendar days after it has paid the
claim, except that the notification shall be given at least 30 days prior to
the running of any applicable statute of limitations or period required for
notice of claim. If an insurer does not
notify its insured within the time periods prescribed above and the statute of
limitations or period required for notice of claim has expired, the insurer
shall forthwith remit to its insured the full amount of the insured's
deductible.
IX. LOSSES DUE TO THEFT
49. Q:
Must insurance companies report auto theft losses to anyone other than
local law enforcement?
A: Yes.
All auto insurance companies doing business in the state of New York are
required to become members of the National Insurance Crime Bureau (NICB). Insurance companies must report to NICB any
thefts of its insured vehicles valued at $5,000.00 or more prior to the loss. The report to NICB must be made within two
business days following notice of the claim.
First and third party physical damage losses, where the amount of the
damage exceeds $2,500.00, must be reported to NICB as well, but these reports
need not be made until within five calendar days following payment of the
claim. [Reg. 64, Sec. 216.8 (a)-(d)]
§216.8(a)-(d)
§ 216.8 Verification and reporting
requirements applicable to losses arising under automobile physical damage
policies and reporting of third‑party property damage losses.
(a) Preamble. The purpose of this section is to implement
the provisions of section 3412 of the Insurance Law, which provides for
measures to be applied by insurers and a central organization engaged in loss
prevention in order to prevent payment of fraudulent claims arising under
automobile physical damage policies.
Such measures shall include: reporting of data on private passenger
automobiles involved in total losses to a central organization engaged in loss
prevention, as designated by the superintendent; verification procedures to be
applied by insurers prior to the payment of total theft losses; restrictions on
the insured's retention of salvage; restrictions and procedures for insurer's
disposition of salvage; the insurer's right to retrieve located stolen or
abandoned vehicles; and notification by insurers to law enforcement agencies,
when the insurer or the central organization suspects improper or fraudulent
action on the part of the insured, or others involved in the loss settlement
process.
(b) Applicability. This section shall apply to all losses
involving private passenger automobiles of the current model year and the
preceding six model years and older private passenger automobiles with an
actual cash value of $5,000 or more, prior to the loss. A private passenger automobile shall mean a
four‑wheel private passenger vehicle, station wagon, van, jeep‑type
vehicle or pickup truck.
(c) Central organization. The central organization is hereby
designated to be the National Insurance Crime Bureau, hereinafter referred to
as NICB. All insurers licensed to write
automobile physical damage insurance in this State are hereby required to
become members of the NICB, for the purpose of compliance with this section.
(d) Reporting and follow‑up
requirements. Insurers shall report
all private passenger automobiles involved in losses to the NICB, as follows:
(1) All total theft losses shall be reported
immediately, but no more than two business days following notice of claim, as
defined in section 216.1(d) of this Part.
If the insurer has not received any acknowledgment or communication from
the NICB within 10 calendar days following its submission of the total theft
report to the NICB, the insurer shall immediately communicate with the NICB to
determine the status of its report.
(2) All other first and third‑party
losses, however sustained, where damage to the claimant's vehicle exceeds
$2,500 shall be reported to the NICB no later than five calendar days after the
sale of salvage or, if the insured or claimant is permitted to retain the
vehicle, no later than five calendar days after the date of loss payment.
50. Q:
Are insurance companies excused from the claim settlement time frames of
Reg. 64 when the loss is due to theft?
A: Yes, and this is due to the reporting and verification
procedures involving NICB. The
insurance company is required to defer paying the theft claim to the
policyholder for five (5) calendar days after acknowledgment by the NICB of the
insurance company's theft report. If
the insurance company hears nothing further from NICB during this five-day
period, then it may continue with the processing of the claim. [Reg. 64, Sec. 216.8 (e)]
§216.8(e)
(e) Verification procedures required prior
to paying a total theft loss.
Notwithstanding the provisions of section 216.7(b) and (c) of this Part,
an insurer shall comply with NICB verification procedures prior to its payment
of a total theft loss, subject to the rules provided for in this section.
(1) The insurer shall defer the payment of a
claim for five calendar days following receipt of the acknowledgment from the
NICB of the insurer's total theft report.
If no further communication is received from the NICB during this five‑day
period indicating unresolved questionable circumstances, the insurer shall
continue with the processing of the claim in accordance with the provisions of
this Part.
(2) If the NICB verification procedure indicates
insurance coverage by more than one insurer or a previously unrecovered theft
loss, the insurers shall promptly investigate and resolve such discrepancy.
(3) If the NICB verification procedure reveals
an erroneous vehicle identification number (VIN) and the NICB is unable to
clear up such discrepancy internally, a questionnaire will be sent to the
insurer by the NICB. This questionnaire
shall be returned to the NICB within five business days of receipt by the
insurer. Should NICB and insurer
efforts, after due diligence, be unsuccessful in resolving the VIN error after
a 30‑day period from date of report of loss to the insurer on a vehicle
that has been inspected pursuant to Part 67 of this Title, the insurer shall
proceed with the processing of the loss in accordance with the provisions of
this Part.
(4) Subject to the provisions of subdivision (h)
of this section, if the NICB certification procedure indicates that the theft
loss may be fraudulent, the insurer shall suspend processing of the loss. The NICB shall then cooperate in promptly
investigating the matter.
51. Q:
What if the insurance company, after filing its report, fails to receive
any acknowledgment from the NICB?
A: After ten (10) days have elapsed, the
insurance company is obligated to follow up with the NICB as to the status of
the matter. [Reg. 64, Sec. 216.8 (e)]
§216.8(e)
(e) Verification procedures required prior
to paying a total theft loss.
Notwithstanding the provisions of section 216.7(b) and (c) of this Part,
an insurer shall comply with NICB verification procedures prior to its payment
of a total theft loss, subject to the rules provided for in this section.
(1) The insurer shall defer the payment of a
claim for five calendar days following receipt of the acknowledgment from the
NICB of the insurer's total theft report.
If no further communication is received from the NICB during this five‑day
period indicating unresolved questionable circumstances, the insurer shall
continue with the processing of the claim in accordance with the provisions of
this Part.
(2) If the NICB verification procedure indicates
insurance coverage by more than one insurer or a previously unrecovered theft
loss, the insurers shall promptly investigate and resolve such discrepancy.
(3) If the NICB verification procedure reveals
an erroneous vehicle identification number (VIN) and the NICB is unable to clear
up such discrepancy internally, a questionnaire will be sent to the insurer by
the NICB. This questionnaire shall be
returned to the NICB within five business days of receipt by the insurer. Should NICB and insurer efforts, after due
diligence, be unsuccessful in resolving the VIN error after a 30‑day
period from date of report of loss to the insurer on a vehicle that has been
inspected pursuant to Part 67 of this Title, the insurer shall proceed with the
processing of the loss in accordance with the provisions of this Part.
(4) Subject to the provisions of subdivision (h)
of this section, if the NICB certification procedure indicates that the theft
loss may be fraudulent, the insurer shall suspend processing of the loss. The NICB shall then cooperate in promptly
investigating the matter.
PART
3: THIRD PARTY DAMAGE CLAIMS
I. INITIAL CLAIMS PROCESSING
52. Q: If
the policyholder is accused of causing property damage to a third party due to
the policyholder's own negligence, what steps must the insurance company take
upon receipt of the claim by the claimant?
A: The insurance company must, within fifteen
(15) days of receiving the notice of the claim, either send a written
acknowledgment to the claimant or pay the claim. [Reg. 64, Sec. 216.10 (a)]
§216.10(a)
§ 216.10
Standards for prompt, fair and equitable settlement of third‑party
property damage claims arising under motor vehicle liability insurance
contracts.
This
section is applicable to claims arising under motor vehicle liability insurance
contracts affording coverage for claims of property damage by third parties
caused by the alleged negligence of the insured. The following provisions of this Part shall also be applicable to
these claims: sections 216.0(a), (b), (d), (e) ; 216.1; 216.2 (preamble);
216.3; 216.4(b), (c), (d), (e); 216.5; 216.6(a), (b), (e)‑(g); 216.7(a),
(b)(4)‑(6), (II)‑(13), (c)(1), (3), (4); and 216.11.
(a) Within 15 business days of receipt of
notice of claim, the insurer shall send either written acknowledgment of the
receipt of notice of claim, or payment, to the claimant or the claimant's
representative.
(1) When notice of a claim is received from a
claimant or the claimant's representative, and the insurer is of the opinion
that it is not liable for any payment, then its sole obligation shall be to
advise the claimant in writing that it is the insurer and furnish the claimant
with its policy number and deny the claim, setting forth the reasons therefor.
53. Q:
What happens if the insurance company argues that its policyholder is
not at fault?
A: All the insurer need do is notify the
claimant in writing of its reasons for denying payment. [Reg. 64, Sec. 216.10 (a)(1)]
§216.10
(a)(1)
(a) Within 15 business days of receipt of
notice of claim, the insurer shall send either written acknowledgment of the
receipt of notice of claim, or payment, to the claimant or the claimant's
representative.
(1) When notice of a claim is received from a
claimant or the claimant's representative, and the insurer is of the opinion
that it is not liable for any payment, then its sole obligation shall be to
advise the claimant in writing that it is the insurer and furnish the claimant
with its policy number and deny the claim, setting forth the reasons therefor.
II. COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE
54. Q:
What is the comparative negligence rule in New York?
A: It is the rule that allows an insurance
company to reduce its offer to the claimant based on the percentage of fault
attributable to the claimant. Thus, if
the total amount of the damage was $2,500.00 and the insurance company is of
the opinion that the claimant was 30% responsible for the accident, then the
insurance company will offer only $1,750.00 in settlement. An explanation of the comparative negligence
rule must be included in the insurance company's claim acknowledgment. [Reg. 64, Sec. 216.10 (a)(3)(i)]
§216.10(a)(3)(i)
(3) (i)
In all other claims, the written acknowledgment by the insurer shall
inform the claimant that the insured has a policy which, to the extent of the
insured's negligence, provides coverage for property damage, including the loss
of use of damaged property and any other out‑of‑pocket expenses
reasonably attributable to the accident.
The acknowledgment shall also state that in no event will the recovery
against the insurer exceed the maximum amount of the policy. The acknowledgment shall contain an
explanation of the comparative negligence rules in New York, to the effect
that, should the insurer's investigation determine that its insured is only
partially liable, coverage of the property damage, loss of use and other
expenses will only be partially reimbursed in accordance with the percentage
that the insured is found to be at fault in the accident.
III. REQUESTING ADDITIONAL INFO
55. Q:
Assuming that the insurance company needs additional information from
the claimant to process and evaluate the claim, when must this additional
information be requested?
A: The initial request from the insurance
company for additional information must be made with the acknowledgment of the
claim or must be made by telephone or personal contact with the claimant. After receipt of the requested information,
should the insurance company determine that more information is necessary, then
that request of the claimant must be made within ten (10) business days of the
first receipt of information. [Reg.64,
Sec. 216.10 (a)(3)(ii)]
§216.10(a)(3)(ii)
(ii) Concurrent with the acknowledgment, the
insurer shall send a claim form or shall request by telephone or personal
contact any pertinent additional information necessary for the insurer to reach
a final evaluation of the claim. Within
10 business days of acknowledgment of the claim or the receipt of the
information requested when acknowledging the claim, the insurer must request
any additional information required to process the claim. If, during the investigation, additional
information will be required, the insurer must initiate a request for such
information within 10 business days after the need for the information is
established. If the insurer is advised
by the claimant that the claimant is pursuing recovery under another policy,
the insurer may suspend action on the claim.
IV. INFORMING THE POLICYHOLDER
56. Q:
What happens if the notice from the third party claimant is the first
notice that the insurance company receives concerning the accident?
A: Then the insurance company must notify its
policyholder of the pending claim within seven days. The notice to the policyholder must state that failure to
cooperate with the insurance company will result in a breach of the policy,
thereby allowing the insurance company to legally refuse coverage on the
pending claim. The result is that the
policyholder will be held personally liable.
[Reg. 64, Sec. 216.10 (b)]
§216.10(b)
(b) If a claimant has given notice of loss and
the insurer has not received notice of the incident from its policyholder,
then, within seven business days after notice by the claimant the insurer shall
notify the policyholder that failure to give notice and to cooperate with the
insurer may result in the company disclaiming liability and the possibility
that the policyholder will be held personally liable. A form shall also be furnished to the insured for the insured's
use in detailing the incident unless the insurer shall accept a prior telephone
or personal contact which has resulted in securing the required information.
57. Q: If
the insurance company determines that
the policyholder is in breach and disclaims coverage, must it inform the
claimant of this fact?
A: Yes, within five business days of its
determination of the policyholder's breach.
[Reg. 64, Sec. 216.10 (c)]
§216.10(c)
(c) If the insurer determines that there was no
policy in force or that it is disclaiming liability because of a breach of
policy provisions by the policyholder, the insurer shall inform the claimant in
writing within five business days of such determination.
V. ACCEPTANCE OR DENIAL OF A CLAIM
58. Q:
When must the insurance company inform the claimant of its determination
with respect to the claim?
A: Within ten business days after it completes
its investigation. [Reg. 64, Sec.
216.10 (e)]
§216.10(e)
(e) Within 10 business days of the completion
of its investigation of a property damage claim, the insurer shall:
(1) make a written offer which is first computed
in the same manner as would be used if the claim were made under a first‑party
coverage by one of its insureds, and, if applicable, modified to give effect to
the comparative negligence statute of this State, or any other state subject to
policy limits. Any offer based on
comparative negligence shall contain a factual and complete explanation of the
insurer's basis for apportioning culpability.
If the claim presented is greater than policy limits, then the claimant
must be so advised; or
(2) deny the claim in writing, giving specific
reasons therefor.
59. Q:
What must the insurance company's response include?
A: If the insurance company accepts responsibility
for the claim on behalf of its policyholder, then the offer must be for the
full amount of the claim up to the limits of the policy (the policyholder is
responsible for the difference, if any).
If the insurance company determines the claimant is partly responsible
for the damages, then the offer is reduced by the percentage amount that the
insurance company determines is the claimant's fault. Any offer asserting the claimant's comparative negligence must be
detailed and completely factual. [Reg.
64, Sec. 216.10 (e)(1)]
§216.10(e)
(e) Within 10 business days of the completion
of its investigation of a property damage claim, the insurer shall:
(1) make a written offer which is first computed
in the same manner as would be used if the claim were made under a first‑party
coverage by one of its insureds, and, if applicable, modified to give effect to
the comparative negligence statute of this State, or any other state subject to
policy limits. Any offer based on
comparative negligence shall contain a factual and complete explanation of the
insurer's basis for apportioning culpability.
If the claim presented is greater than policy limits, then the claimant
must be so advised
VI. PERMISSIBLE DELAYS
60. Q:
Generally speaking, how much time does the insurer have to either accept
or deny the claim?
A: Sixty (60) calendar days is usually deemed
sufficient. Should more time be needed,
the insurer must send the claimant a written explanation for the delay. In no event should a decision take more than
six (6) months unless, of course, the claim goes into litigation. [Reg. 64, Sec. 216.10 (f)].
216.10 (f)
(f) If the investigation is not complete 60
calendar days subsequent to the claimant's notice of loss, the insurer shall
send a written explanation of the specific reasons for the delay in claim
settlement. An updated letter shall be
sent every 60 calendar days thereafter, but the insurer must within six months
of the notice of loss advise the claimant of its decision pursuant to paragraph
(e)(1) or (2) of this section. This
requirement shall cease to be applicable after a claim has been placed into
litigation or the insurer advises the claimant of its decision.
PART
4: RECORD KEEPING REQUIREMENTS
61. Q:
What records must an insurance company maintain?
A: Insurance companies must maintain all
communications, transactions, notes and work papers relating to the claim. All of these communications must be dated. The records enable Insurance Department
Examiners to verify that insurance companies are in compliance with the law
when these examiners do their periodic audits.
Insurance companies are to maintain their files in such a manner that
examiners can reconstruct the history of the claim. [Reg. 64, Sec. 216.11]
§216.11
§ 216.11 Examinations.
To verify
compliance with this Part and related statutes, Insurance Department examiners
will investigate the market performance of insurers. To enable department personnel to reconstruct an insurer's
activities, all insurers subject to the provisions of this Part must maintain
within each claim file all communications, transactions, notes and work papers
relating to the claim. All
communications and transactions, whether written or oral, emanating from or
received by the insurer shall be dated by the insurer. Claim files must be so maintained that all
events relating to a claim can be reconstructed by the Insurance Department
examiners. Insurers shall either make a
notation in the file or retain a copy of all forms mailed to claimants.
PART
5: TEXT OF REGULATION 64
CHAPTER IX
UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES § 216.0
PART 216
(Regulation
64)
UNFAIR CLAIMS SETTLEMENT PRACTICES
AND
CLAIM COST CONTROL MEASURES
(Statutory authority: Insurance Law, §§ 201,
301, 305[a], 2601, 2610, 3411, 3412)
Sec.
216.0 Preamble
216.1 Definitions
216.2 Applicability
216.3 Misrepresentation of policy provisions
216.4 Failure to acknowledge pertinent
communications
216.5 Standards for prompt investigation of claims
216.6 Standards for prompt, fair and equitable
settlements
216.7 Standards for Prompt, fair and equitable
settlement of motor vehicle physical damage claims
216.8 Verification and reporting requirements
applicable to losses arising under automobile physical damage policies and
reporting of third‑party property damage losses
216.9 Written notice to claimants of payment of
claim in third‑party settlements
216.10 Standards for prompt, fair and equitable
settlement of third‑party property damage claims arising under Motor
vehicle liability insurance Contracts
216.11 Examinations
216.12 Forms
Historical
Note
Part (§§
216.0‑216.6) filed Dec. 5, 1972; repealed, new (§§ 216.0‑216.11)
filed May 12, 1982 eff. Aug. 15, 1982.
§ 216.0 Preamble.
(a) Section 2601 of the Insurance Law prohibits
insurers doing business in this State from engaging in unfair claims settlement
practices and provides that, if any insurer performs any of the acts or
practices proscribed by that section without just cause and with such frequency
as to indicate a general business practice, then those acts shall constitute
unfair claims settlement practices.
This Part contains claim practice rules which insurers must apply to the
processing of all first‑ and third‑party claims arising under
policies subject to this Part. In
addition. specific rules are provided for the processing of first‑party
motor vehicle physical damage claims and third‑party property damage
claims arising under motor vehicle liability insurance contracts.
(b) This Part is issued for the purpose of defining
certain minimum standards which. if violated without just cause and with such
frequency as to indicate a general business practice. would constitute unfair
claims settlement practices. This Part
is not exclusive, and other acts. not herein specified, may also be found to
constitute such practices.
(c) Section 3411(i) of the Insurance Law has
been implemented by section 216.7 of this Part.
(d) Section 3412 of the Insurance Law has been
implemented by section 216.8 of this Part.
(e) Claim practice principles to be followed
by all insurers. (1) Have as your
basic goal the prompt and fair settlement of all claims.
(2) Assist the claimant in the processing of a
claim.
(3) Do not demand verification of facts unless
there are good reasons to do so. When
verification of facts is necessary, it should be done as expeditiously as
possible.
(4) Clearly inform the claimant of the insurer's
position regarding any disputed matter.
(5) Respond promptly. when response is
indicated, to all communications from insureds, claimants attorneys and any,
other interested persons.
(6) Every insurer shall distribute copies of this
regulation to every person directly responsible for the supervision, handling
and settlement of claims subject to this regulation, and every insurer shall
satisfy itself that all such personnel are thoroughly conversant with, and are
complying with, this regulation.
Historical
Note
Sec. filed
Dec. 5, 1972; amd. filed Jan. 14, 1975; repealed, new filed May 12, 1982; and
filed Sept. 4, 1984 eff. Oct. 1,
1984. Amended (a), (c) and (d).
§ 216.1 Definitions.
The
definitions set forth in this section shall govern the construction of the
terms used in this Part.
(a) Agent shall mean any person, firm,
association or corporation authorized to act as the representative of an
insurer and licensed pursuant to the provisions of article 21 of the Insurance
Law. With respect to group life and
group accident and health policies, the group policyholder shall be the agent
of the insurer to the extent such policyholder has been authorized to act on
behalf of such insurer.
(b) Claimant shall mean any person who
attempts to obtain a benefit from an insurer.
(c) Investigation shall mean any
procedure adopted by an insurer to determine whether to accept or reject a
claim.
(d) Business day shall mean a day other
than Saturday, Sunday or a New York State legal holiday.
(e) Notice of claim shall mean any
notification, whether in writing or otherwise, to an insurer or its agent, by
any claimant who reasonably appraises the insurer of the facts pertinent to a
claim.
Historical
Note
Sec. filed
Dec. 5, 1972; repealed, new filed May 12, 1982; amd. filed Sept. 4, 1984
eff. Oct. 1, 1984. Amended (a).